Ah thank you. That was actually answering a large part of my question. It is indeed striking and very interesting that most efficient help seems to come from organisations that don’t loose too many words on what could be done and that don’t go and let money run through too many filters.
I for my part am critical about aid that is tied to religious matters or any other than the primary interest to help those in need, even though the help provided knows [hopefully] no boundaries. But if given the choice between the prospect of dark channels vs. religiously influenced aid, I’d rather stay with the latter.